Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 SO2D 1127 - Smith v. Moncrief

Smith v. Moncrief’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2002

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

100198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc. · Texaco, Inc. v. Vermilion Parish School Board · Friedman Iron & Supply Co. v. J. B. Beaird Co. · Kane v. Braquet · 214 So. 2d 552 - Sterkx v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Rapides Par.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that a litigant may not recover an amount greater than that for which he prayed in his petition. Friedman Iron and Supply Co. v. J.B. Beaird Co., Inc., 222 La. 627 , 63 So.2d 144 (1952); Alumaglass Corp. v. Succession of Kendrick, 303 So.2d 911 (La.App. 1st Cir.1974); writs refused February 14, 1977. The only exception to this rule of which we are cognizant involves elements of special damages in situations when otherwise inadmissible evidence is admitted without objection and the pleadings are enlarged to that extent. LSA-C.C.P. Article 1154; Sterkx v. Gravity Drainage District No. 1 of Rapides Parish, 214 So.2d 552 , (La.App. 3rd Cir.1968), writs refused [ 252 La. 964 , 215 So.2d 130 ] November 15, 1968.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.