Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 So. 2d 1267 - Batchelor v. Brye

421 So. 2d 1267 - Batchelor v. Brye’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2007

8 state decisions

40198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Jones · Higgins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company · Williams v. Colquett · 50 Ala. App. 691 - Higgins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company · 49 Ala. App. 457 - Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Clem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to meet the plaintiff's measure of damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The plaintiffs insurer . . . stood in the shoes of the uninsured motorist . . . as a source of payment to the plaintiff. . . . Though the jury, without knowledge of the plaintiffs settlement with [his insurer], later found the plaintiffs damages to be $30,000, the plaintiff had already received one-third of that amount from his insurer due to the liability of [the uninsured motorist]."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the $10,000 received by the plaintiff under the uninsured motorist provision of his policy [to] be used to partially satisfy the $30,000 judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.