421 So. 2d 1364 - Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 766 So. 2d 860 - Thomas v. State (1998), Fisher v. State (1991)
2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Dusky v. United States · Weatherford v. Bursey · Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A denial of funds to procure an expert witness does not deprive a defendant of his constitutional rights. Thigpen v. State , 372 So.2d 385 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979). However, `Alabama Code 1975, Section 15-12-21 (d) provides that "(c)ounsel (appointed to defend an indigent defendant) shall also be entitled to be reimbursed for any expenses reasonably incurred in such defense to be approved in advance by the trial court, but in no individual case shall such expenses exceed one-half of the allowable attorney fees provided in this section. (Emphasis added.)" `Section 15-12-21 clearly authorizes reimbursement for any expense reasonably incurred in the defense of an indigent by a court appointed attorney if such expense is approved in advance by the trial court. . . . However, such expenses must be approved by the trial court. (Emphasis added).' Bailey v. State , 421 So.2d 1364 , 1367 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Proof of the incompetency of an accused to stand trial involves more than simply a mere showing that the accused has mental problems or psychological difficulties. The competence of an accused to stand trial is determined by whether at the time of the trial he has sufficient present ability to consult with his attorney with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceeding against him."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Common sense, as well as sound legal authority, dictates that the trial judge not grant a psychiatric examination at state expense unless there is some reason to believe the accused was incompetent or insane.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.