Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 So. 2d 160 - Thomas v. State

421 So. 2d 160 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2006

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

160198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lockett v. Ohio · Wingo v. Wedding · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon · Pesce v. United States · Spinkellink v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At the hearing in the court below it was established that the difficulty between appellant and his lawyer was due to appellant’s refusal to communicate with tire lawyer. The court ruled that this constitutes no ground for holding that there was a denial of effective assistance of counsel. ... A defendant must not be allowed to refuse to cooperate with his attorney and then attempt to create an issue of ineffective counsel on the basis of his refusal to cooperate.” 421 So. 2d at 164 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant must not be allowed to refuse to cooperate with his attorney and then attempt to create an issue of ineffective counsel on the basis of his refusal to cooperate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.