Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 So. 2d 826 - Wagner v. State

421 So. 2d 826 - Wagner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2013

8 state decisions

501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · State Ex Rel. Pensacola News-Journal, Inc. v. Fleet · Cephus v. United States · United States v. White · Tkach v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Initially, we note that it is clear under the appropriate rule that Wagner did not waive his motion for judgment of acquittal by the introduction of evidence in his defense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380. The State may not rely upon evidence presented during Wagner's subsequent defense to supply essential missing links in the State's prima facie case to support the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. Therefore, we will not consider the evidence presented in the appellant's defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.