421 So. 2d 834 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 502 So. 2d 543 - State v. Perry (1986), 678 So. 2d 19 - State v. Bordenave (1996)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Myers · State v. Toomer · 362 So. 2d 744 - State v. Guzman · 367 So. 2d 1155 - State v. Lewis · 384 So. 2d 773 - State v. Boutte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Furthermore, the occupants having run from the car in the ditch with the door open, coupled with the officer's having probable cause to believe those running had recently robbed a bank, would strongly suggest to the officers that the automobile's former occupants had no expectation of privacy in the vehicle but rather that they had abandoned the vehicle and disassociated themselves from it. The officers were justified in conducting an on-the-scene search of the vehicle and seizing the evidence taken from the robberies. [Citation omitted.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the car is movable, the occupants are alerted, and the car's contents may never be found again if a warrant must be obtained.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"... Before the exception may be invoked by the state against the defendant, allowing introduction of a permanent record made in the ordinary course of business from personal knowledge of the facts recorded, or from information furnished by one having a business duty to observe and report the facts, it must be shown that the person who made the record is genuinely unavailable for testimony, that he had no strong motive to misrepresent, and that in all probability the evidence is trustworthy..." See also State v. Parker, 421 So.2d 834 (La.1982); State v. Phagans, 412 So.2d 580 (La.1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.