Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 S.W.2d 116 - Reed v. State

Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
April 1982
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1982

7 state decisions

30196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 162 Tex. Crim. 25 - Durham v. State · 159 Tex. Crim. 421 - Carrier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . It is the general rule in this and most jurisdictions that the defense of entrapment is not available to a defendant who denies that he committed the offense charged [citing 61 A. L. R. 2d 677].” Reed v. Texas (Tex. Crim. App. 1967), 421 S. W. 2d 116, 117 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.