Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 SW2D 162 - Letcher v. Letcher

Letcher v. Letcher’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1999

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

601967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kahn v. Kahn · City of Galveston v. Hill · Lindsay v. Clayman · Jackson v. Hernandez · Kidd v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. As between the parties to a fraudulent transaction, the transfer designed to defraud creditors passes title to the property, and the grantor may thereafter assert no right, title or interest in the property . . . ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “For Dellerman to set aside his deed to Mrs. Mangold he must prove that it was executed and recorded to defraud his creditors, but when he does that he loses his case under the law. The Supreme Court has closed the door to grantors who shield their property from the just claims of creditors and later seek to recover from their grantee in whom was placed the apparent title. Lott v. Kaiser, 61 Tex. 665, 670 . If everything happened that Dellerman claims, he has no enforceable right. “This is so for reasons of public policy, to discourage fraudulent transactions. The courts leave the parties in the position in which they have placed themselves. Davis v. Sittig, 65 Tex. 497 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.