Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 421 SW2D 261 - Pyles v. Roth

Pyles v. Roth’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1981
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1981

3 state decisions

10196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Probst Ex Rel. Probst v. Seyer · Binion v. Armentrout · Garland v. Wilcox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The driver of a vehicle . . . shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonably safe and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon and the condition of the roadway.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.