Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently December 2007 · most notably Moulden v. State (1978), Britton v. State (1979)
2 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Rabinowitz · Preston v. United States · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[o]nce a bona fide stop or arrest has been made for a traffic offense, the police can make an additional arrest for any other offense unexpectedly discovered during the course of the investigation. If, while questioning a motorist regarding the operation of his vehicle, an officer sees evidence of a criminal violation in open view, or in some other manner acquires probable cause on a more serious charge, he may arrest for that offense and incident thereto conduct an additional search for physical evidence. . This is true even if no specific statement of fact of the second arrest is made. . ” Taylor v. State, 421 S.W.2d 403 at 407 (Tex.Cr.App.1967). (Emphasis supplied.)”
13 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Denham v. State · Elliott v. State““It is doubtful if Preston should be interpreted to mean a police officer must under all circumstances search or complete the search of the vehicle at the moment of arrest when an equally prudent course of action would be to move the vehicle to a more convenient or suitable location for the search.” jfc * ⅜ ⅜: * ⅜ “We are inclined to believe that the holding in Preston turned upon the lack of continuity in purpose by the arresting officers there.” [citations omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State““[t]he removal of the automobile to Marshall and the subsequent search were a series of events constituting one continuous happening.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Borner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.