Ex parte Weinstein’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Penson v. Ohio · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]alse testimony is material only if there is a 'reasonable likelihood' that it affected the judgment of the jury.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is a 'reasonable likelihood' that [the false evidence] affected the judgment of the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Chaney · Ex parte Lalonde“The applicant must still prove his habeas-corpus claim by a preponderance of the evidence, but in doing so, he must prove that the false testimony was material and thus it was reasonably likely to influence the judgment of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Lalonde
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.