Charles Stobaugh v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · Clampitt v. Interinsurance Exchange · Hooper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he circumstantial evidence, even if it supports an inference that Charles did something to Kathy and that Kathy died as a result of that something, nonetheless wholly fails to provide the jury with any facts from which the jury could also reasonably infer that the mens rea Charles possessed when he did that something to Kathy was the mens rea for murder, as opposed to some other mens rea, such as the mens rea for manslaughter. 3”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Stobaugh, Charles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.