Premier Electrical Construction Company v. Miller-Davis Company and St. Arnaud Electric Company, Premier Electrical Construction Company v. Miller-Davis Company’s Empirical Analysis
422 F.2d 1132 · 1970
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Aluminum Co. of America (1971), Pony Creek Cattle Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (1979)
36 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. · Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. · United States v. General Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e believe that Perma Life holds only that plaintiffs who do not bear equal responsibility for creating and establishing an illegal scheme, or who are required by economic pressures to accept such an agreement, should not be barred from recovery simply because they are participants.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.