Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 F.2d 185 - Marshall v. United States

Marshall v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

422 F.2d 185 · 1970

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
12
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently December 2007 · most notably United States v. Harflinger (1970), United States v. Worthington (1977)

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 12 states

8401970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5821 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5841 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5848 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 26 U.S.C. § 5851 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Ker v. State of California · Leary v. United States · Harris v. United States · Marchetti v. United States · Grosso v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plain view rule does not go into hibernation at sunset.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘A search implies an examination of one’s premises or person with a view to the discovery of contraband or evidence of guilt to be used in prosecution of a criminal action. The term implies exploratory investigation or quest. Haerr v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 240 F.2d 533, 535 .’ ””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It has long been settled that objects falling in the plain view of an officer who has a right to be in the position to have that view are subject to seizure and may be introduced in evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.