Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 F.2d 475 - Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bartlett

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

422 F.2d 475 · 1970

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
October 1993
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 1993 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. (1971)

24 federal appellate ·

240197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Grinnell Corp. · J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner · Riehle v. Margolies · Johnson v. United States · Anderson v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interlocutory orders appointing receivers, or refusing orders to wind up receiverships or to take steps to accomplish the purposes thereof, such as directing sales or other disposals of property,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A record which reflects an appropriate ground for a trial court's observations refutes any claim of personal bias”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The record before Judge Miller disclosed that after July, 1965, the defendant AL & T had issued more than four million dollars worth of interest-bearing bond investment certificates, many of them to innocent members of the public who apparently thought they were investing in savings accounts similar to those provided by banks and savings and loan associations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.