Central Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board’s Empirical Analysis
422 F.2d 504 · 1970
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 1993 · most notably Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New Haven (1981), The Fort Worth National Corporation v. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the Fort Worth National Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (1972)
10 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · United States v. Philadelphia National Bank · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · United States v. Rock Royal Co-Op Noyes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he HOLA directs the Board to give ‘primary consideration to the best practices of local mutual thrift and home-financing institutions in the United States.’ . the courts have construed this language as vesting discretion in the Board to determine first, what the ‘best practices’ are, and second, to implement them on a nationally uniform basis. The fact that any particular state has not adopted for its own institutions what the Board deems to be a ‘best practice’ cannot limit the Board’s authority without undermining this fundamental purpose of the statute.” (emphasis in original)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In order to provide local mutual thrift institutions in which people may invest, their funds and in order to provide for the financing of homes, the Board is authorized, under such rules and regulations as it may prescribe, to provide for the organization, incorporation, examination, operation, and regulation of ... Federal Savings and Loan Associations . . . and to issue charters therefor, giving primary consideration to the best practices of local mutual thrift and home-financing institutions in the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““. . . The ultimate effects of the operation of mobile facilities [of a federal savings and loan association], be they beneficial or detrimental, fall within the scope of those issues statutorily committed to the exclusive discretion of the Board. . . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.