United States v. Workcuff’s Empirical Analysis
422 F.2d 700 · 1970
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably United States v. Mills (1979), United States v. McCoy (1970)
30 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company · Stevens v. Marks · Hardy v. United States · Frank A. Tate v. United States of America, Robert M. Edelin v. United States · Washington v. Clemmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all proceedings in criminal cases had in open court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[recollections and notes of trial counsel and of others are apt to be faulty and incomplete. Frequently, issues simply cannot even be seen — let alone assessed — without reading an accurate transcript.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“our review [would be] turned into an exercise in creative imagination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re ETA · In re E.T.A.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.