Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 F.3d 1211 - Roberts v. Printup

Roberts v. Printup’s Empirical Analysis

422 F.3d 1211 · 2005

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2023

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

150200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Salve Regina College v. Russell · Simms v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services · Glenn v. Fleming · Bollinger v. Nuss · Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Kansas Administrative Regulation 40-1-34, with some exceptions not relevant here, adopts by reference the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Model Regulation. No exceptions are set forth as to § 6(a), which provides that '[e]very insurer, upon receiving notification of a claim shall, within ten working days, acknowledge the receipt of such notice unless payment is made within such period of time.’ UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES MODEL REGULATION § 6(a), available at http://www. ksinsurance.org/company/Model-Laws/Ref40-l-34.htm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Kansas Supreme Court rejected the argument that 'any time an insurance agent acquires knowledge of some injury to a policyholder it becomes the company's duty to initiate an investigation and offer a settlement . . . without any claim being made. . . .' Instead, the court found that 'the insured has some duty to give notice to his company of his loss, and of the fact that he is making a claim under his policy before the company is obligated to move.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.