Warren v. Kyler’s Empirical Analysis
422 F.3d 132 · 2005
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Williams v. Taylor · In the Matter of Samuel Winship
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]n habeas review we are in no position to second-guess the state courts’ determination as to [the] state law issue [of its own established retroactivity doctrines], We must rather review for a potential violation of federal law and because we conclude that nothing in the Constitution requires states to apply their own decisions retroactively, we find no such violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chao v. Caple
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.