Bleavins v. Bartels’s Empirical Analysis
422 F.3d 445 · 2005
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Anderson v. Creighton · Mapp v. Ohio · Payton v. New York · Ornelas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the ultimate questions of reasonable suspicion and probable cause to make a warrantless search should be reviewed [by appellate courts] de novo,” id. at 691, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , although courts of appeals are "to review findings of historical fact only for clear error and to give due weight to inferences drawn from those facts by resident judges,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the ultimate questions of reasonable suspicion and probable cause to make a warrantless search should be reviewed [by appellate courts] de novo,” id. at 691, 116 S.Ct. 1657 , although courts of appeals are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.