United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
422 F.3d 665 · 2005
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2021
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Mashek · Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of Washington · United States v. Flores · United States v. Beran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To cause a loan to be made — knowing that you are violating proper banking procedure ... from the bank that employs you to a firm in which you have a substantial financial interest — to do all this and actively conceal what you are doing — is willful misapplication of bank funds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Sentencing under Booker requires, as a `critical starting point,' that the district court calculate the advisory guidelines sentencing range in the same manner it would have calculated the range under the mandatory Guidelines regime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.