Preminger v. Principi’s Empirical Analysis
422 F.3d 815 · 2005
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Rodriguez v. Robbins (2013), Preminger v. Peake (2008)
24 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. · Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad · Widmar v. Vincent · McConnell United States Senator et al. v. Federal Election Commission et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An action of the Secretary to which section 552(a)(1) or 553 of title 5 (or both) refers (other than an action relating to the adoption or revision of the schedule of ratings for disabilities adopted under section 1155 of this title) is subject to judicial review. Such review shall be in accordance with chapter 7 of title 5 and may be sought only in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 3”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we first must `identify the nature of the forum, because the extent to which the Government may limit access depends on whether the forum is public or nonpublic.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“For the purpose of the prohibition expressed in this paragraph unauthorized demonstrations or services shall be defined as, but not limited to, ... partisan activities which may be described as commentary or actions in support of, or in opposition to, or attempting to influence, any current policy of the Government of the United States, or any private group, association, or enterprise.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.