United States v. Thomas

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 19, 2011

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-04-19

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2012

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on United States of America v. Mitchell Ray Daugherty

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-04-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM: *

¶1Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Roy Ellison Thomas presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.