422 F. Supp. 2d 468 - Silverstein v. Percudani’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Morse v. Lower Merion School District · Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A federal district court exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state law causes of action must apply the substantive law of the State [providing the cause of action] as interpreted by the State's highest court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.