422 F. Supp. 2d 810 - Bell v. Prefix, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 2007
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)
Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co. · Burns v. Alcala · Ziegler v. IBP Hog Market, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.