Mansfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · Brown v. Ohio · Malloy v. Hogan · United States v. Jorn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 506 , 98 S.Ct. 824 . Whether manifest necessity to declare a mistrial and, thus, whether the prohibition of the double jeopardy clause is triggered depend upon the unique facts and circumstances of each case. While it is in the sound discretion of the trial judge to declare a mistrial, he or she may do so only if a 'high degree' of necessity demands that he or she do so. Mansfield v. State , 422 Md. 269 , 287, 29 A.3d 569 (2011) (citations omitted). In addition to this”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.