State v. Rothstein’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · State v. Olkon · Syrovatka v. State · State v. Ford · State v. Lenorud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Whether the informant was a material witness. * * * (b) Whether informer’s testimony will be material to the issue of guilt. * * * (c) Whether testimony of officers is suspect. * * * (d) Whether the informant’s testimony might disclose entrapment. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Solheim“The defendant must explain precisely what testimony he thinks the informant will give and how this testimony will be relevant to a material issue of guilt or innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Solheim
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.