Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 N.W.2d 381 - State v. Meier

State v. Meier’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2022

15 state decisions

7019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney · Sims v. Georgia · United States v. Ellenbogen · New Jersey v. Russo · United States v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"12.1-17-03. Reckless endangerment. A person is guilty of an offense if he creates a substantial risk of serious bodily injury or death to another. The offense is a class C felony if the circumstances manifest his extreme indifference to the value of human life. Otherwise it is a class A misdemeanor. There is risk within the meaning of this section if the potential for harm exists, whether or not a particular person’s safety is actually jeopardized.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`rule is patterned on a Federal rule, the Federal courts' interpretation of the Federal rule is highly persuasive.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “‘[a] person commits a misdemeanor if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.