State v. Glover’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"To have reasonable suspicion to detain an individual, '[a] police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.' Terry , 392 U.S. at 21 . The suspicion must have " 'a particularized and objective basis' " and be something more than 'an unparticularized suspicion or hunch.' State v. DeMarco , 263 Kan. 727 , 735, 952 P.2d 1276 (1998) (quoting Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690 , 696, 116 S. Ct. 1657 , 134 L.Ed.2d 911 [1996], and citing United States v. Sokolow , 490 U.S. 1 , 7, 109 S. Ct. 1581 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 [1989] ). Although the United States Supreme Court has recognized that 'the concept of reasonable suspicion is somewhat abstract,' it has 'deliberately avoided reducing it to " 'a neat set of legal rules.' " United States v. Arvizu , 534 U.S. 266 , 274, 122 S. Ct. 744 , 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002)." State v. Glover , 308 Kan. 590 , 593-94, 422 P.3d 64 (2018).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Daniels · Schreiner v. Hodge

2. “the officer has an articulable and reasonable suspicion, based in fact, that the detained person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Schreiner v. Hodge