State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · United States v. Baker · I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant · State v. Pagan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(citation and internal quotation marks omitted) ). Moreover, if there is no evidence that one charged with attempted murder had express malice and a specific intent to kill, we believe the crime would involve a lower level of intent[, and] thus, would fall within the lesser degrees of the assault and battery offenses codified in section 16-3-600. See S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-600 (2015 & Supp. 2016) (identifying levels and degrees of assault and battery offenses). Id.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Williams · State v. Smith“created the offense of attempted murder by purposefully adding the language 'with intent to kill' to 'malice aforethought, either express or implied' to require a higher level of mens rea for attempted murder than that of murder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Shands“[a]ttempted murder can be committed only when the accused's acts are accompanied by express malice , malice in fact. One cannot attempt to kill another with implied malice because there”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.