Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1987
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 322 So. 2d 22 - Dinkel v. Dinkel · 408 So. 2d 782 - Culpepper v. Culpepper · 419 So. 2d 354 - Lisenby v. Lisenby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“carefully examined the record for evidence tending to show, as required for change of custody previously ordered by judicial decree, that the mother's custody substantially changed the child's living conditions in a way adversely affecting the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We find no suggestion here that the able circuit judge departed from the appropriate standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is enough that the record displays it,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.