Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 SO2D 1033 - Bates v. State

Bates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2009

7 state decisions

40198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Odom v. United States · 413 So. 2d 872 - Carnavil v. Pines of Delray Ass'n · Hodges v. State · 410 So. 2d 924 - Wilt v. State · 378 So. 2d 1234 - Albright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is fundamental that the prosecution may not impugn the character of an accused unless the accused first puts character into issue at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.