Rosenburg v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cuccia v. Allstate Insurance Company · 397 So. 2d 805 - Perez v. Plaquemines Parish Commission Council · 373 So. 2d 166 - Ray v. Associated Indem. Corp. · 393 So. 2d 304 - Robertson v. Travis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Proof of mailing of notice of cancellation, or of intention not to renew or of reasons for cancellation, to the named insured at the address shown in the policy, shall be sufficient proof of notice."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.