Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 SW2D 364 - Van Brunt v. Meyer

Van Brunt v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1998

8 state decisions

301967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burger v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. · McGee v. Wabash Railroad · Zalle v. Underwood · Bollman Ex Rel. Sanderson v. Kark Rendering Plant · McVicar v. WR Arthur & Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every person riding a bicycle or motorized bicycle upon a street or highway shall be granted all of the rights and shall be sub- jeet to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle as provided by chapter 304, RSMo, except as to special regulations in sections 307.180 to 307.193 and except as to those provisions of chapter 304, RSMo, which by their nature can have no application.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.