Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 S.W.2d 770 - McFadden v. Cecil Ruby Co.

McFadden v. Cecil Ruby Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1970
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Joske v. Irvine · Kuper v. Schmidt · Glade v. Dietert · Snyder v. Jones · Molsen v. Compania Industrial

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The record reflects that an asphalt curb was built across a portion of the Thornton Freeway to divert traffic while portions of the freeway were still in construction; that the curb was built by a subcontractor which had finished its work a year or so earlier; that on July 6, 1965, just prior to the opening of the Freeway for traffic, the Resident Engineer of the Highway Department requested defendant Ruby Company to remove the curb; that defendant did such to the satisfaction of the Highway Department and the removal complied with Highway Department requirements; that the highway was opened to the public on July 15, 1965”. ° .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.