Seefurth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2007 · most notably Brown v. State (1986), Baity v. State (1970)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rojas v. State · Williams v. State · Jones v. State · Ash v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By failing to comply with the requirements of Articles 36.14 and 36.15, supra, at the trial itself appellant waived his right to have his objections and special requested charges considered. Scott v. State, 106 Tex.Cr.R. 376 , 292 S.W. 891 ; Lopez v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 517 , 17 S.W.2d 807 ; Hanvy v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 351 , 162 S.W.2d 721 ; Arrisola v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 369 , 350 S.W.2d 551 . “These articles are mandatory and there must be strict compliance with their provisions. See Templeton v. State, 152 Tex.Cr.R. 121 , 210 S.W.2d 168 ; Cedillo v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 371 , 307 S.W.2d 267 ; Hays v. State, 129 Tex.Cr.R. 156 , 84 S.W.2d 1008 .””
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Perkins v. State · Gill v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.