Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 422 U.S. 205 - Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville

Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

2,081
cited by 2,081 later decisions
141
cited 141 times by the Supreme Court
42
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

600 federal appellate · 169 district · 563 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,081 later decisions (141 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Buckley v. Valeo (1976), Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n (1983)

600 federal appellate · 169 district · 563 state decisions — followed in 42 states

7910197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Grayned v. City of Rockford · United States v. O'Brien · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.

Cited together with Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. · Miller v. California · United States v. O'Brien · Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,081 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “selectively ... shield the public from some kinds of speech on the ground that they are more offensive than others.”
    39 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “readily subject to a narrowing construction by the state courts,”
    30 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[s]peech that is neither obscene as to youths nor subject to some other legitimate proscription cannot be suppressed solely to protect the young from ideas or images that a legislative body thinks unsuitable for them.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.