Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

422 U.S. 935

95 S. Ct. 2670

45 L. Ed. 2d 662

Docket No. 73-1462.

White v. Regester

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1975-06-30

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Vacated and remanded · 8–0 · Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1975-06-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. Clements (1993), Terrazas v. Ramirez (1991)

8 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

210197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Elizabeth B. Levatino, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellants.

David R. Richards, Austin, Tex., and Don Gladden, Fort Worth, Tex., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We are informed that the State of Texas has adopted new apportionment legislation providing single-member districts to replace the multimember districts which are at issue before us in this case. That statute by its terms does not become effective until the 1976 elections, and intervening special elections to fill vacancies, if any, will be held in the districts involved as constituted on January 1, 1975. Rather than render an unnecessary judgment on the validity of the constitutional views expressed by the District Court in this case, which we do not undertake to do at this time, we vacate the judgment of the District Court and remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of the recent Texas reapportionment legislation and for dismissal if the case is or becomes moot.

¶2

So ordered.

¶3

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

/422/us/935 · .json · Public domain