Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 F.2d 101 - Schell v. United States

Schell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

423 F.2d 101 · 1970

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2025

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

60197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company · Roberts v. Florida · Carter v. United States · Pilkington v. United States · Marvel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under all the circumstances — the youth and inexperience of Schell, the lapse of six months between [the plea hearing and the sentencing hearing], the change in posture of the case due to the events in the interim and due to questions of the validity of the March plea— the express waiver of counsel in March should not be deemed effective in September.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.