Nolan v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
423 F.2d 1031 · 1969
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Polizzi (1974), United States v. Barnard (1973)
47 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968) · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Katz v. United States · Blockburger v. United States · Bruton v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'each count requires proof of a fact or element not required by the other.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Where prosecution stated that it would prove certain facts but failed to do so after an adverse trial court ruling, where it subsequently noted failure in its closing argument, any possible confusion which may have been created by unfulfilled statement was thus corrected.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vassaur v. State““The perpetration of toll frauds on the telephone company’s direct dialing and billing machinery has required monitoring of telephone lines by employees to detect the illegal users and to fulfill the company’s statutory duties to the Government and to its customers.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.