Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 F.2d 1149 - Brooks v. United States

Brooks v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

423 F.2d 1149 · 1970

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
16
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Commonwealth v. Pounds (1980), Perez v. Sullivan (1986)

16 federal appellate · 19 state decisions — followed in 16 states

230197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Hill v. United States · United States v. Ewell · Smith v. Hooey · Pollard v. United States · Smith v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he sensitive concerns which surround the necessity of a speedy trial on the merits of a case generally are not applicable when the delay is between conviction and sentencing. There exists here no concern over “oppressive incarceration” before trial, “anxiety” over public accusation before trial, or any “impairment” over the petitioner’s ability to defend himself.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is unnecessary for us to make a decision at this time as to whether an unreasonable delay in sentencing constitutes an infringement of a jurisdictional or constitutional right. We hold that there has not been, under constitutional standards, any “purposeful” or “oppressive” delay in this particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the essential ingredient of the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is "orderly expedition and not mere speed."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.