Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

423 F.2d 1197

Docket No. 23645.

Luttrell v. United States

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-02-17

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1973

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1970-02-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Adelbert G. Clostermann (argued), Portland, Or., for appellant.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civil Div., Lawrence F. Ledebur, Chief, Admiralty Section, Morton Hollander, Chief, Appellate Section, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Erskine Wood (argued), of Wood, Wood, Tatum, Mosser & Brooke, Portland, Or., John F. Meadows, Dept. of Justice, Admiralty and Shipping Sec., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This case falls in the area where the trial judge, on all of the evidence, could have found in favor of either party. We are certain we cannot find that the court was required to find in favor of plaintiff. Thus, we cannot say the findings, conclusions and decree (judgment order) are clearly erroneous.

¶2

Decree affirmed.

/423/f2d/1197 · .json · Public domain