Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 F.2d 821 - United States v. Corbin

United States v. Corbin’s Empirical Analysis

423 F.2d 821 · 1970

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2009

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

1101970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Merz · United States v. City of New York · City of St. Louis v. Turner · United States v. Jaramillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... whether proper legal standards were applied in resolving the issue of just compensation and whether any supplemental findings of the district court were clearly erroneous. A commission's findings are considered only to see whether the district court properly accepted and approved them as not being clearly erroneous. United States v. Brinker, 433 F.2d 773 (10th Cir. 1969).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e recognize that departure from the unit rule is permissible in unique situations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.