Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 F.2d 940 - Dunham v. Wright

Dunham v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

423 F.2d 940 · 1970

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
5
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably Canterbury v. Spence (1972), Sard v. Hardy (1977)

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

16019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schloendorff v. Society of the New York Hospital · Natanson v. Kline · 154 Cal. App. 2d 560 - Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees · Gray v. Grunnagle · Smith v. Yohe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he patient has the right and responsibility to determine whether he wants to risk the suggested corrective surgery. If a patient’s decision is to be a knowing and intelligent one, he must understand in addition to the risks of the suggested surgery, the possible results of the failure to chance it. A complete understanding of the consequences of foregoing the operation would seem necessarily to include a consideration of the alternative treatment for the patient’s disease or condition. ■”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.