Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 MASS 141 - Poly v. Moylan

Poly v. Moylan’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 district · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Kattar v. Demoulas (2000), Masingill v. EMC Corp. (2007)

2 federal appellate · 14 district · 50 state decisions

360199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 814 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680

Relies on United States v. Gaubert · Berkovitz v. United States · Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann · Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc. · Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely Bartlett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Moylan withdrew with court approval from the action pending in the Superior Court on March 25, 1992. The claim was not dismissed against Janet Gillis until August 1992, and was not dismissed against her husband until November 2, 1993. Therefore, when Moylan withdrew from the case with court permission after notice to the plaintiff, there was still a viable case pending against the Gillises and it was still possible to proceed with discovery and investigation .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen established governmental policy, as expressed or implied by statute, regulation, or agency guidelines, allows a Government agent to exercise discretion, it must be presumed that the agent's acts are grounded in policy when exercising that discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]lthough this does not necessarily mean there was no bias, we do take [it] into consideration when viewing the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.