Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 MASS 798 - Commonwealth v. Pavao

Commonwealth v. Pavao’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. Correa (1997), Commonwealth v. Grant (1998)

34 state decisions

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Porter v. States · Frederick Wiseman v. Massachusetts · United States v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “except to note that the defendant was well represented by counsel, that the defendant consulted frequently with defense counsel during trial, that the result of the trial was "fairly clear" given the weight of the evidence and defense counsel's concession of guilt in closing arguments [regarding several of the charges], and that "it seems incredible to suggest that [the defendant's] waiver was not knowing and voluntary, which, of course, is the purpose of the colloquy."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To allow harmless error analysis of this sort is inconsistent with the right to a jury trial altogether. Surely if a defendant had asked for a jury trial and it had been denied him, a conviction could not be saved by this analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[e]xactly the kind of doubts our rule is intended to avoid would arise, were we to rely on what a defendant says after a conviction to establish what he knew and intended at the earlier moment when he waived his rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.