Byrer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watts v. State · Williams v. State · Cotton v. State · Proctor v. State · 179 Ind. App. 267 - Fox v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person who knowingly or intentionally aids, induces or causes another person to commit an offense commits that offense, even if the other person: (1) has not been prosecuted for the offense; (2) has not been convicted of the offense; or (3) has been acquitted of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peterson v. State“The facts and circumstances of each case must be reviewed to determine whether a person participated in the commission of an offense as an accomplice, for, as Justice Hunter observed, there are no ‘hard and fast rules in this area of the law.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edgecomb v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.