Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 P2D 282 - Hartwell v. State

Hartwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
8
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2019

10 state decisions

50196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. United States · People v. Dail · Melrose Distillers, Inc. v. United States · Alaska Gastineau Mining Co. v. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co. · Borden v. Arctic Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Jurisdiction to determine the issue of guilt or innocence is now assumed by the ultimate arbiter of human affairs.” Bagley v. State, Fla.App., 122 So.2d 789, 791 (1960).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hat effect does the death of the appellant, pending disposition of his appeal from a criminal conviction, have on the proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Death withdrew the defendant from the jurisdiction of the court. It left no apportionment of jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.