Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 P2D 393 - Borrego v. State

Borrego v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2013

11 state decisions

50196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neusbaum v. State · Espy v. State · State v. Wilson · Coca v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * We indicated in the Wilson case [ State v. Wilson, 76 Wyo. 297 , 301 P.2d 1056 (1956)] that although ordinarily the appellate court will not review or revise a trial court's refusal to grant a bill of particulars, such rule is tempered considerably under constitutional provisions which grant accused the right to be fully informed of the nature of his accusation."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] “concert of action” does not necessitate actual words or written compact since it [is] well settled * * * that if two persons engaged in such an assault are aiding or abetting each other in what they do a previous understanding is not necessary * * * fa or(jer ⅛ render each of them accountable for the other’s acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.