Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 P3D 1084 - Rippo v. State

Rippo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · Hill v. Lockhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deficient performance prevented [Chappell] from establishing . . . that the sentence was imposed, in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution or laws of this State.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(1) that counsel's performance was deficient and (2) that counsel's deficient performance prejudiced [him].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “met the first component of the good-cause showing required under NRS 34.726(1).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.